Unaltered historical capture. Website claims belong to the captured page.Full image
Original capture · SA-064
Capture of stanlakegroup.co.uk on 11 October 2026: a Lovable Trust & Safety website takedown notice.
What the example presents
An established investment group
What to examine
Why does it need a second domain?

Audience / at-risk group

Retail investors and anyone offered an online investment account

What you can notice

  • Official warning from the Financial Conduct Authority (United Kingdom) naming Stanlake Group, dated 6 August 2026, as published through IOSCO's I-SCAN alerts.
  • The .co.uk domain was registered on 21 January 2026, according to its registry record.
  • On 11 October 2026 it redirected to www.stanlakeltd.com, which served Lovable's Trust & Safety takedown notice.
  • The same notice, on the same platform, was found the same day on renovae.app, warned by Quebec's regulator (see SA-063).

The takeaway

A professional-looking investment website can be built in an afternoon with an AI website builder. Before you send money, look the firm up in your own country's financial regulator register, and treat a site that disappears behind a platform's takedown notice as a warning about every other site run by the same people.

What the source reports

Desenmascara publishes stanlakegroup.co.uk as Fraudulent: the attributed regulator warning is corroborated by the hosting platform's own abuse takedown. The redirect and the takedown notice were captured by Desenmascara on 11 October 2026. Follow the report for the full record and any later correction.

What this evidence cannot tell us

This case documents a regulator's public warning and the hosting platform's takedown notice; it is not an independent investigation by this project. The capture shows the takedown notice, not the original site. A regulator's "unauthorised" warning concerns licensing in that jurisdiction and does not by itself prove fraud, customer losses or operator identity. The platform does not publish why it removed the site. If either source withdraws its notice, this case is withdrawn too.

Suggest a correction